Paper detail

HI content, metallicities and spin temperatures of damped and sub-damped Lyman alpha systems in the redshift desert (0.6 < z < 1.7)

The HI 21cm absorption optical depth and the N(HI) derived from Lya absorption can be combined to yield the spin temperature (Ts) of DLAs. Although Ts measurements exist for samples of DLAs with z <0.6 and z >1.7, the intermediate redshift regime currently contains only 2 HI 21cm detections, leading to a `redshift desert' that spans 4 Gyrs of cosmic time. To connect the low and high z regimes, we present observations of the Lya line of six 0.6<z<1.7 HI 21cm absorbers. The dataset is complemented by both VLBA observations (to derive the absorber covering factor, f), and optical echelle spectra from which metal abundances are determined. Our dataset therefore not only offers the largest statistical study of HI 21cm absorbers to date, and bridges the redshift desert, but is also the first to use a fully f-corrected dataset to look for metallicity-based trends. In agreement with trends found in Galactic sightlines, we find that the lowest N(HI) absorbers tend to be dominated by warm gas. In the DLA regime, spin temperatures show a wider range of values than Galactic data, as may be expected in a heterogenous galactic population. However, we find that low metallicity DLAs are dominated by small cold gas fractions and only absorbers with relatively high metallicities exhibit significant fractions of cold gas. Using a compilation of HI 21cm absorbers which are selected to have f-corrected spin temperatures, we confirm an anti-correlation between metallicity and Ts at 3.4 sigma significance. Finally, one of the DLAs in our sample is a newly-discovered HI 21cm absorber (at z=0.602 towards J1431+3952), which we find to have the lowest f-corrected spin temperature yet reported in the literature: Ts=90+-23 K. The observed distribution of Ts and metallicities in DLAs and the implications for understanding the characteristics of the interstellar medium in high redshift galaxies are discussed.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.