Paper detail

HI 21 cm opacity fluctuations power spectra towards Cassiopeia A

The angular power spectrum of HI 21 cm opacity fluctuations is a useful statistic for quantifying the observed opacity fluctuations as well as for comparing these with theoretical models. We present here the HI 21 cm opacity fluctuation power spectrum towards the supernova remnant Cas A from interferometric data with spacial resolution of 5" and spectral resolution of 0.4 km/s. The power spectrum has been estimated using a simple but robust visibility based technique. We find that the power spectrum is well fit by a power law P_tau(U) = U^{alpha} with a power law index of alpha ~ -2.86 +/- 0.10 (3 sigma error) over the scales of 0.07 - 2.3 pc for the gas in the Perseus spiral arm and 0.002 - 0.07 pc (480 - 15730 au) for that in the Local arm. This estimated power law index is consistent with earlier observational results based on both HI emission over larger scales and absorption studies over a similar range of scales. We do not detect any statistically significant change in the power law index with the velocity width of the frequency channels. This constrains the power law index of the velocity structure function to be beta = 0.2 +/- 0.6 (3 sigma error).

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.