Paper detail

Heterogeneous Millimeter Wave Wireless Power Transfer With Poisson Cluster Processes

In this paper, we analyze the energy coverage performance of heterogeneous millimeter wave (mmWave) wireless power transfer (WPT) networks, where macro base stations (MBSs) are distributed according to a Poisson point process (PPP), the location of power beacons (PBs) is modeled as a $k$-tier Poisson cluster process (PCP), and energy users (EUs) are clustered around the centers of PB clusters. Moreover, the cosine antenna gain model is adopted instead of the prevalent flap-top gain model, which is simpler in derivation but less accurate. Based on the generalized exponential distribution approximation, we propose a new technique of deriving the energy coverage probability of randomly deployed mmWave WPT networks. Specifically, taking the Thomas cluster process (TCP) for instance, we derive the energy coverage probabilities with two PB association strategies, i.e., the random PB association and the nearest PB association. Through Monte-Carlo simulations, our theoretical results are verified and the impact of system parameters, such as the array antenna size, energy threshold or average number of PBs in a cluster, are also investigated.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.