Paper detail

Herschel-ATLAS/GAMA: What determines the far-infrared properties of radio-galaxies?

We perform a stacking analysis of H-ATLAS data in order to obtain isothermal dust temperatures and rest-frame luminosities at 250um (L250), for 1599 radio sources over the H-ATLAS P1 GAMA area. The radio sample is generated using a combination of NVSS data and K-band UKIDSS-LAS data, over 0.01<z<0.8. The FIR properties of the sample are investigated as a function of L_1.4 GHz, z, projected radio-source size and radio spectral index. In order to search for stellar-mass dependent relations, we split the parent sample into those sources which are below and above 1.5 L_{K}^{*}. Correcting for stellar mass and redshift, we find no relation between the L250 and L_1.4GHz of radio AGN. This implies that a galaxy's nominal radio luminosity has little or no bearing on the SFR and/or dust mass content of the host system. The L250 of both the radio detected and non radio-detected galaxies (defined as those sources not detected at 1.4GHz but detected in the SDSS with r'<22) rises with increasing z. For mass and colour matched samples, sub-1.5 L_{K}^{*} and super-1.5 L_{K}^{*} radio-detected galaxies have 0.89\pm0.18 and 0.49\pm0.12 times the L250 of their non radio-detected counterparts. We explain these results in terms of the hotter, denser and richer halo environments massive radio-galaxies maintain and are embedded in. These results indicate that all massive radio galaxies (>1.5 L_{K}^{*}) may have systematically lower FIR luminosities (~25%) than their colour-matched non radio-detected counterparts. Compact radio sources (<30kpc) are associated with higher L250s and dust temperatures than their more extended (>30kpc) counterparts. The higher dust temperature suggests that this may be attributed to enhanced SFRs, but whether this is directly or indirectly due to radio activity (e.g. jet induced or merger-driven SF) is as yet unknown.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access23 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.