Paper detail

HEP computing collaborations for the challenges of the next decade

Large High Energy Physics (HEP) experiments adopted a distributed computing model more than a decade ago. WLCG, the global computing infrastructure for LHC, in partnership with the US Open Science Grid, has achieved data management at the many-hundred-Petabyte scale, and provides access to the entire community in a manner that is largely transparent to the end users. The main computing challenge of the next decade for the LHC experiments is presented by the HL-LHC program. Other large HEP experiments, such as DUNE and Belle II, have large-scale computing needs and afford opportunities for collaboration on the same timescale. Many of the computing facilities supporting HEP experiments are shared and face common challenges, and the same is true for software libraries and services. The LHC experiments and their WLCG- partners, DUNE and Belle II, are now collaborating to evolve the computing infrastructure and services for their future needs, facilitated by the WLCG organization, OSG, the HEP Software Foundation and development projects such as HEP-CCE, IRIS-HEP and SWIFT-HEP. In this paper we outline the strategy by which the international HEP computing infrastructure, software and services should evolve through the collaboration of large and smaller scale HEP experiments, while respecting the specific needs of each community. We also highlight how the same infrastructure would be a benefit for other sciences, sharing similar needs with HEP. This proposal is in line with the OSG/WLCG strategy for addressing computing for HL-LHC and is aligned with European and other international strategies in computing for large scale science. The European Strategy for Particle Physics in 2020 agreed to the principles laid out above, in its final report.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.