Paper detail

Helium in first and second-generation stars in Globular Clusters from spectroscopy of red giants

(abridged) Recent spectroscopic and photometric observations show the existence of various generations of stars in GCs, differing in the abundances of products of H-burning at high temperatures (the main final product being He). It is important to study the connections between stars properties and He content. We consider here the about 1400 stars on the Red Giant Branch (RGB) observed with FLAMES@VLT in 19 Galactic GCs, part of out Na-O anticorrelation projet. Stars with different He are expected to have different temperatures (i.e. colours), slightly different [Fe/H], and different luminosity levels of the RGB bump. All these differences are small, but our study has the necessary precision, good statistics, and homogeneity to detect them. We also computed suitable sets of stellar models (BaSTI) for various assumptions about the initial helium content. Differences in observable quantities that can be attributed to variations in He content are generally detectable between stars of the Primordial (P, first-generation) and Extreme (E, second-generation) populations, but not between the Primordial and Intermediate ones (I). The only exception (differences are significant also between P and I populations) is NGC2808, where three populations are clearly separated also on the Main Sequence and the Horizontal Branch. The average enhancement in the He mass fraction Y between P and E stars is about 0.05-0.11, depending on the assumptions. The differences in Y, for NGC2808 alone, are about 0.11-0.14 between P and I stars, and about 0.15-0.19 between P and E stars, again depending on the assumptions. The RGB bump luminosity of first and second-generation stars has different levels; the implied Y difference is more difficult to quantify, but is in agreement with the other determinations.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.