Paper detail

Helicity and winding fluxes as indicators of twisted flux emergence

Evidence for the emergence of twisted flux tubes into the solar atmosphere has, so far, come from indirect signatures. In this work, we investigate the topological input of twisted flux tube emergence directly by studying helicity and winding fluxes. In magnetohydrodynamic simulations with domains spanning from the top of the convection zone to the lower corona, we simulate the emergence of twisted flux tubes with a range of different initial field strengths. One important feature of this work is the inclusion of a convectively-unstable layer beneath the photosphere. We find approximately self-similar behaviour in the helicity input for the different field strengths considered. As the tubes rise and reach the photosphere, there is a strong input of negative helicity since we consider left-handed twisted tubes. This phase is then followed by a reduction of the negative input and, for low initial field strengths, a net positive helicity input. This phase corresponds to the growing influence of convection on the field and the development of serpentine field structures during emergence. The winding flux can be used to detect when the twisted cores of the tubes reach the photosphere, giving clear information about the input of topologically complex magnetic field into the solar atmosphere. In short, the helicity and winding fluxes can provide much information about how a magnetic field emerges that is not directly available from other sources, such as magnetograms. In evaulating the helicity content of these simualtions we test numerous means for creating synthetic magnetograms, including methods which acount for both the evolving geometry and the finite extent of the photosphere. Whilst the general qualitative behaviours are same in each case, the different forms of averaging do affect the helicity and winding inputs quantitatively.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.