Paper detail

Hebbian Crosstalk and Input Segregation

Purpose: We previously proposed that Hebbian adjustments that are incompletely synapse specific ("crosstalk") might be analogous to genetic mutations. We analyze aspects of the effect of crosstalk in Hebbian learning using the classical Oja model. Methods: In previous work we showed that crosstalk leads to learning of the principal eigenvector of EC (the input covariance matrix pre-multiplied by an error matrix that describes the crosstalk pattern), and found that with positive input correlations increasing crosstalk smoothly degrades performance. However, the Oja model requires negative input correlations to account for biological ocular segregation. Although this assumption is biologically somewhat implausible, it captures features that are seen in more complex models. Here, we analyze how crosstalk would affect such segregation. Results: We show that for statistically unbiased inputs crosstalk induces a bifurcation from segregating to non-segregating outcomes at a critical value which depends on correlations. We also investigate the behavior in the vicinity of this critical state and for weakly biased inputs. Conclusions: Our results show that crosstalk can induce a bifurcation under special conditions even in the simplest Hebbian models and that even the low levels of crosstalk observed in the brain could prevent normal development. However, during learning pairwise input statistics are more complex and crosstalk-induced bifurcations may not occur in the Oja model. Such bifurcations would be analogous to "error catastrophes" in genetic models, and we argue that they are usually absent for simple linear Hebbian learning because such learning is only driven by pairwise correlations.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.