Paper detail

Heavy Quarkonium at finite temperature and chemical potential

We generalize known results for heavy quarkonium in a thermal bath to the case of a finite baryonic density, and provide a number of formulas for the energy shift and decay width that hold at weak coupling for sufficiently large temperature and/or chemical potential. We find that a non-vanishing decay width requires a temperature larger than the typical binding energy, no matter how large the chemical potential is. This implies that at zero temperature the dissociation mechanism of heavy quarkonium is due entirely to screening, unlike in the finite temperature case. We use several effective theories in order to sort out the contributions of the relevant energy and momentum scales. In particular, we consider contributions of the so called quasi-static magnetic modes. The generalization to the case of a finite isospin/strangeness chemical potential is trivial. We discuss possible applications to the SIS and NICA conditions, and compare with available lattice results.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.