Paper detail

Heavy Quark Production at a $γγ$ Collider: the Effect of Large Logarithmic Perturbative Corrections

We present quantitative results on the cross section for $γ+ γ(J_z=0) \to b \bar{b}\to two b$-jets based on the recently achieved all orders resummation of large soft (Sudakov) and hard (non-Sudakov) double logarithms. The next-to-leading order QCD perturbative corrections are included exactly. We find that one needs to include at least four loops for the novel hard leading logarithms, on the cross section level, in order to be safe from large opposite sign cancellations that plagued earlier phenomenological studies. We find that the background to intermediate mass Higgs boson production at a future photon linear collider (PLC) is thus reasonably well under control and should allow the direct determination of the partial Higgs width $Γ(H \to γ+ γ)$. Assuming high efficiency $b$-tagging, the total Higgs width measurement at a PLC is thus a realistic goal.

preprint1998arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.