Paper detail

Heating Rates for Protons and Electrons in Polar Coronal Holes: Empirical Constraints from the Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer

Ultraviolet spectroscopy of the extended solar corona is a powerful tool for measuring the properties of protons, electrons, and heavy ions in the accelerating solar wind. The large coronal holes that expand up from the north and south poles at solar minimum are low-density collisionless regions in which it is possible to detect departures from one-fluid thermal equilibrium. An accurate characterization of these departures is helpful in identifying the kinetic processes ultimately responsible for coronal heating. In this paper, Ultraviolet Coronagraph Spectrometer (UVCS) measurements of the H I Lyman alpha line are analyzed to constrain values for the solar wind speed, electron density, electron temperature, proton temperature (parallel and perpendicular to the magnetic field) and Alfven-wave amplitude. The analysis procedure involves creating a large randomized ensemble of empirical models, simulating their Lyman alpha profiles, and building posterior probability distributions for only the models that agree with the UVCS data. The resulting temperatures do not exhibit a great deal of radial variation between heliocentric distances of 1.4 and 4 solar radii. Typical values for the electron, parallel proton, and perpendicular proton temperatures are 1.2, 1.8, and 1.9 MK, respectively. Resulting values for the "nonthermal" Alfven wave amplitude show evidence for weak dissipation, with a total energy-loss rate that agrees well with an independently derived total heating rate for the protons and electrons. The moderate Alfven-wave amplitudes appear to resolve some tension in the literature between competing claims of both higher (undamped) and lower (heavily damped) values.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.