Paper detail

Heat flux deposition on plasma-facing components using a convective model with ripple and Shafranov shift

A heat flux deposition code is a very useful tool for the design of plasma-facing components. The classical cosine model representative of the convective parallel heat flux was coded within the standard finite element code of the CEA Castem 2000. Two perturbations to the idealised magnetic surfaces were taken into account: the Shafranov shift and the ripple of the toroidal magnetic field. The calculation scheme -- named Tokaflu -- was confronted to previous computations on bottom modular limiters and to experiments on the inner first wall. The code was used to optimise the shape of future plasma-facing components in Tore Supra designed for the CIEL project, namely the toroidal pumped limiter and its neutralisers. Developments are under way to include the shadowing of the components, other power deposition schemes and possibly later plasma sections other than circular.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.