Paper detail

Healthy versus pathological learning transferability in shoulder muscle MRI segmentation using deep convolutional encoder-decoders

Automatic segmentation of pathological shoulder muscles in patients with musculo-skeletal diseases is a challenging task due to the huge variability in muscle shape, size, location, texture and injury. A reliable fully-automated segmentation method from magnetic resonance images could greatly help clinicians to plan therapeutic interventions and predict interventional outcomes while eliminating time consuming manual segmentation efforts. The purpose of this work is three-fold. First, we investigate the feasibility of pathological shoulder muscle segmentation using deep learning techniques, given a very limited amount of available annotated pediatric data. Second, we address the learning transferability from healthy to pathological data by comparing different learning schemes in terms of model generalizability. Third, extended versions of deep convolutional encoder-decoder architectures using encoders pre-trained on non-medical data are proposed to improve the segmentation accuracy. Methodological aspects are evaluated in a leave-one-out fashion on a dataset of 24 shoulder examinations from patients with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy and focus on 4 different muscles including deltoid as well as infraspinatus, supraspinatus and subscapularis from the rotator cuff. The most relevant segmentation model is partially pre-trained on ImageNet and jointly exploits inter-patient healthy and pathological annotated data. Its performance reaches Dice scores of 82.4%, 82.0%, 71.0% and 82.8% for deltoid, infraspinatus, supraspinatus and subscapularis muscles. Absolute surface estimation errors are all below 83mm$^2$ except for supraspinatus with 134.6mm$^2$. These contributions offer new perspectives for force inference in the context of musculo-skeletal disorder management.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.