Paper detail

Haze: Privacy-Preserving Real-Time Traffic Statistics

We consider traffic-update mobile applications that let users learn traffic conditions based on reports from other users. These applications are becoming increasingly popular (e.g., Waze reported 30 million users in 2013) since they aggregate real-time road traffic updates from actual users traveling on the roads. However, the providers of these mobile services have access to such sensitive information as timestamped locations and movements of its users. In this paper, we describe Haze, a protocol for traffic-update applications that supports the creation of traffic statistics from user reports while protecting the privacy of the users. Haze relies on a small subset of users to jointly aggregate encrypted speed and alert data and report the result to the service provider. We use jury-voting protocols based on threshold cryptosystem and differential privacy techniques to hide user data from anyone participating in the protocol while allowing only aggregate information to be extracted and sent to the service provider. We show that Haze is effective in practice by developing a prototype implementation and performing experiments on a real-world dataset of car trajectories.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.