Paper detail

Have the missing cosmic baryons been found?

The angular power spectrum and polarization of the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB), the relative abundances of primordial hydrogen, deuterium and helium isotopes, and the large-scale structure of the universe all indicate that 4.5% of the current mass density of the universe consists of baryons. However, only a small fraction of these baryons can be accounted for in stars and gas inside galaxies, galaxy groups and galaxy clusters, and in spectral-line absorbing gas in the intergalactic medium (IGM). Too hot to show up in Lyman-absorption, too cool to cause detectable spectral distortions of the cosmic microwave background radiation, and too diffused to emit detectable X-rays, about 90% of the cosmic baryons remain missing in the local universe (redshift z~0). Here, we report on prevalent, isotropic, source independent, and fairly uniform soft X-ray absorption along the lines of sight to high-z gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) and quasars. It has the magnitude, redshift and energy dependence that are expected from a hot IGM that contains the missing cosmological baryons and has a mean metallicity similar to that in the intracluster medium (ICM) of galaxy clusters.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.