Paper detail

HARQ and AMC: Friends or Foes?

To ensure reliable communication in randomly varying and error-prone channels, wireless systems use adaptive modulation and coding (AMC) as well as hybrid ARQ (HARQ). In order to elucidate their compatibility and interaction, we compare the throughput provided by AMC, HARQ, and their combination (AMC-HARQ) under two operational conditions: in slow- and fast block-fading channels. Considering both, incremental redundancy HARQ (HARQ-IR) and repetition redundancy HARQ (HARQ-RR) we optimize the rate-decision regions for AMC/HARQ and compare them in terms of attainable throughput. Under a fairly general model of the channel variation and the decoding functions, we conclude that i) adding HARQ on top of AMC may be counterproductive in the high average signal- to-noise ratio regime for fast fading channels, and ii) HARQ is useful for slow fading channels, but it provides moderate throughput gains. We provide explanations for these results which allow us to propose paths to improve AMC-HARQ systems.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.