Paper detail

Harnessing Artificial Intelligence to Infer Novel Spatial Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic allergic inflammatory condition of the esophagus associated with elevated esophageal eosinophils. Second only to gastroesophageal reflux disease, EoE is one of the leading causes of chronic refractory dysphagia in adults and children. EoE diagnosis requires enumerating the density of esophageal eosinophils in esophageal biopsies, a somewhat subjective task that is time-consuming, thus reducing the ability to process the complex tissue structure. Previous artificial intelligence (AI) approaches that aimed to improve histology-based diagnosis focused on recapitulating identification and quantification of the area of maximal eosinophil density. However, this metric does not account for the distribution of eosinophils or other histological features, over the whole slide image. Here, we developed an artificial intelligence platform that infers local and spatial biomarkers based on semantic segmentation of intact eosinophils and basal zone distributions. Besides the maximal density of eosinophils (referred to as Peak Eosinophil Count [PEC]) and a maximal basal zone fraction, we identify two additional metrics that reflect the distribution of eosinophils and basal zone fractions. This approach enables a decision support system that predicts EoE activity and classifies the histological severity of EoE patients. We utilized a cohort that includes 1066 biopsy slides from 400 subjects to validate the system's performance and achieved a histological severity classification accuracy of 86.70%, sensitivity of 84.50%, and specificity of 90.09%. Our approach highlights the importance of systematically analyzing the distribution of biopsy features over the entire slide and paves the way towards a personalized decision support system that will assist not only in counting cells but can also potentially improve diagnosis and provide treatment prediction.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access12 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.