Paper detail

Hardware Fingerprinting for the ARINC 429 Avionic Bus

ARINC 429 is the most common data bus in use today in civil avionics. However, the protocol lacks any form of source authentication. A technician with physical access to the bus is able to replace a transmitter by a rogue device, and the receivers will accept its malicious data as they have no method of verifying the authenticity of messages. Updating the protocol would close off security loopholes in new aircraft but would require thousands of airplanes to be modified. For the interim, until the protocol is replaced, we propose the first intrusion detection system that utilizes a hardware fingerprinting approach for sender identification for the ARINC 429 data bus. Our approach relies on the observation that changes in hardware, such as replacing a transmitter or a receiver with a rogue one, modify the electric signal of the transmission. Because we rely on the analog properties, and not on the digital content of the transmissions, we are able to detect a hardware switch as soon as it occurs, even if the data that is being transmitted is completely normal. Thus, we are able to preempt the attack before any damage is caused. In this paper we describe the design of our intrusion detection system and evaluate its performance against different adversary models. Our analysis includes both a theoretical Markov-chain model and an extensive empirical evaluation. For this purpose, we collected a data corpus of ARINC 429 data traces, which may be of independent interest since, to the best of our knowledge, no public corpus is available. We find that our intrusion detection system is quite realistic: e.g., it achieves near-zero false alarms per second, while detecting a rogue transmitter in under 50ms, and detecting a rogue receiver in under 3 seconds. In other words, technician attacks can be reliably detected during the pre-flight checks, well before the aircraft takes off.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.