Paper detail

Hardness of Finding Independent Sets in 2-Colorable and Almost 2-Colorable Hypergraphs

This work studies the hardness of finding independent sets in hypergraphs which are either 2-colorable or are almost 2-colorable, i.e. can be 2-colored after removing a small fraction of vertices and the incident hyperedges. To be precise, say that a hypergraph is (1-eps)-almost 2-colorable if removing an eps fraction of its vertices and all hyperedges incident on them makes the remaining hypergraph 2-colorable. In particular we prove the following results. For an arbitrarily small constant gamma > 0, there is a constant xi > 0, such that, given a 4-uniform hypergraph on n vertices which is (1 - eps)-almost 2-colorable for eps = 2^{-(log n)^xi}, it is quasi-NP-hard to find an independent set of n/(2^{(log n)^{1-gamma}}) vertices. For any constants eps, delta > 0, given as input a 3-uniform hypergraph on $n$ vertices which is (1-eps)-almost 2-colorable, it is NP-hard to find an independent set of delta n vertices. Assuming the d-to-1 Games Conjecture the following holds. For any constant delta > 0, given a 2-colorable 3-uniform hypergraph on n vertices, it is NP-hard to find an independent set of delta n vertices. The hardness result on independent set in almost 2-colorable 3-uniform hypergraphs was earlier known only assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. In this work we prove the result unconditionally. For independent sets in 2-colorable 3-uniform hypergaphs we prove the first strong hardness result, albeit assuming the d-to-1 Games Conjecture. Our result on almost 2-colorable 4-uniform hypergraphs gives the first nearly polynomial hardness factor for independent set in hypergraphs which are (almost) colorable with constantly many colors. It partially bridges the gap between the previous best lower bound of poly(log n) and the algorithmic upper bounds of n^{Omega(1)}.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.