Hardness of Bounded Distance Decoding on Lattices in ℓp\ell_p Norms

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

$ \newcommand{\Z}{\mathbb{Z}} \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon} \newcommand{\cc}[1]{\mathsf{#1}} \newcommand{\NP}{\cc{NP}} \newcommand{\problem}[1]{\mathrm{#1}} \newcommand{\BDD}{\problem{BDD}} $Bounded Distance Decoding $\BDD_{p,α}$ is the problem of decoding a lattice when the target point is promised to be within an αα factor of the minimum distance of the lattice, in the ℓp\ell_{p} norm. We prove that $\BDD_{p, α}$ is $\NP$-hard under randomized reductions where α→1/2α\to 1/2 as p→∞p \to \infty (and for α=1/2α=1/2 when p=∞p=\infty), thereby showing the hardness of decoding for distances approaching the unique-decoding radius for large pp. We also show fine-grained hardness for $\BDD_{p,α}$. For example, we prove that for all p∈[1,∞)∖2Zp \in [1,\infty) \setminus 2\Z and constants $C > 1, \eps > 0$, there is no $2^{(1-\eps)n/C}$-time algorithm for $\BDD_{p,α}$ for some constant αα (which approaches 1/21/2 as p→∞p \to \infty), assuming the randomized Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH). Moreover, essentially all of our results also hold (under analogous non-uniform assumptions) for $\BDD$ with preprocessing, in which unbounded precomputation can be applied to the lattice before the target is available. Compared to prior work on the hardness of $\BDD_{p,α}$ by Liu, Lyubashevsky, and Micciancio (APPROX-RANDOM 2008), our results improve the values of αα for which the problem is known to be $\NP$-hard for all p>p1≈4.2773p > p_1 \approx 4.2773, and give the very first fine-grained hardness for $\BDD$ (in any norm). Our reductions rely on a special family of "locally dense" lattices in ℓp\ell_{p} norms, which we construct by modifying the integer-lattice sparsification technique of Aggarwal and Stephens-Davidowitz (STOC 2018).

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.