Paper detail

Hardness and Approximation Results for $L_p$-Ball Constrained Homogeneous Polynomial Optimization Problems

In this paper, we establish hardness and approximation results for various $L_p$-ball constrained homogeneous polynomial optimization problems, where $p \in [2,\infty]$. Specifically, we prove that for any given $d \ge 3$ and $p \in [2,\infty]$, both the problem of optimizing a degree-$d$ homogeneous polynomial over the $L_p$-ball and the problem of optimizing a degree-$d$ multilinear form (regardless of its super-symmetry) over $L_p$-balls are NP-hard. On the other hand, we show that these problems can be approximated to within a factor of $Ω((\log n)^{(d-2)/p} \big/ n^{d/2-1})$ in deterministic polynomial time, where $n$ is the number of variables. We further show that with the help of randomization, the approximation guarantee can be improved to $Ω((\log n/n)^{d/2-1})$, which is independent of $p$ and is currently the best for the aforementioned problems. Our results unify and generalize those in the literature, which focus either on the quadratic case or the case where $p \in {2,\infty}$. We believe that the wide array of tools used in this paper will have further applications in the study of polynomial optimization problems.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.