Paper detail

Hard X-ray luminosity functions of cataclysmic variables: Joint Swift/BAT and Gaia data

Cataclysmic variables (CVs) are the most numerous population among the Galactic objects emitting in hard X-rays. Most probably, they are responsible for the extended hard X-ray emission of the Galactic ridge and the central Galactic regions. Here we consider the sample of CVs detected in the all-sky hard X-ray Swift/BAT survey which were also detected by Gaia and thus have reliable distance estimates. Using these data, we derive accurate estimates for local number density per solar mass (ρ_M = 1.37^{+0.3}_{-0.16} x 10^{-5} M_sun^{-1}) and luminosity density per solar mass (ρ_L = 8.95^{+0.15}_{-0.1} x 10^{26} erg s^{-1} M_sun^{-1}) for objects in the sample. These values appear to be in good agreement with the integrated Galactic ridge X-ray emission and Nuclear Stellar Cluster luminosities. Analysis of the differential luminosity functions dρ_M/d(\log_{10} L_x) and dρ_L/d(\log_{10} L_x) confirms that there are two populations of hard X-ray emitting CVs. Intermediate polars dominate at luminosities L > 10^{33} erg s^{-1}, whereas non-magnetic CVs and polars are much more numerous but have lower luminosities on average. As a consequence, the contribution of these populations to the observed hard X-ray luminosity is almost equivalent.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.