Paper detail

Hard Negative Sampling via Large Language Models for Recommendation

Hard negative sampling improves recommendation performance by accelerating convergence and sharpening the decision boundary. However, most existing methods rely on heuristic strategies, selecting negatives from a fixed candidate pool. Lacking semantic awareness, these methods often misclassify items that align with users' semantic interests as negatives, resulting in False Hard Negative Samples (FHNS). Such FHNS inject noisy supervision and hinder the model's optimal performance. To address this challenge, we propose HNLMRec, a generative semantic negative sampling framework. Leveraging the semantic reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), HNLMRec directly generates negative samples that are behaviorally distinct yet semantically relevant with respect to user preferences. Furthermore, we integrate collaborative filtering signals into the LLM via supervised fine-tuning, guiding the model to synthesize more reliable and informative hard negatives. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that HNLMRec significantly outperforms traditional methods and LLM-enhanced baselines, while effectively mitigating popularity bias and data sparsity, thereby improving generalization.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.