Paper detail

Hard MeV-GeV spectra of blazars

Very high energy (VHE) gamma-ray emission from a distant source (z >~0.2) can be efficiently absorbed my means of the electron-positron pair creation process. Analyses of the unabsorbed spectra imply that the intrinsic TeV emission of some blazars is hard, with spectral indices 0.5 < alpha < 1. The absorption depends on the level of extragalactic background light (EBL) that is difficult to measure directly. This implies that it is difficult to estimate the slope of the intrinsic TeV emission. To test our blazar emission scenario that is capable to reproducing the hard spectra, we therefore used the observations made by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope in the unabsorbed MeV-GeV energy range. We assume that the X-ray and gamma-ray emission of TeV blazars is produced in a compact region of a jet uniformly filled by particles of relatively high energy (g >~ 10^3, E=g m_e c^2). In other words, we assume a low energy cut-off in the particle energy distribution. The emission produced by the particles with this energy spectrum can explain hard intrinsic spectra in the energy range from MeV up to TeV. We demonstrate how to estimate the basic physical parameters of a source in this case and how to explain the observed spectra by a precise simulation of the particle energy evolution. To test our estimation methods, we use the observations of two blazars with exceptionally hard spectral indices (alpha <~ 0.5) in the MeV-GeV range and known redshifts: RGB J0710+591 and 1ES 0502+675. The estimated values of the Doppler factor and magnetic field are compared with our numerical simulations, which confirm that the particle energy distribution with a low energy cut--off can explain the observed hard spectra well. In addition, we demonstrate that the radiative cooling caused by the inverse-Compton emission in the Klein-Nishina regime may help us to explain the hard spectra.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.