Paper detail

Hard 3-CNF-SAT problems are in $P$ -- A first step in proving $NP=P$

The relationship between the complexity classes $P$ and $NP$ is an unsolved question in the field of theoretical computer science. In the first part of this paper, a lattice framework is proposed to handle the 3-CNF-SAT problems, known to be in $NP$. In the second section, we define a multi-linear descriptor function ${\cal H}_φ$ for any 3-CNF-SAT problem $φ$ of size $n$, in the sense that ${\cal H}_φ: \{0,1\}^n \rightarrow \{0,1\}^n$ is such that $Im \; {\cal H}_φ$ is the set of all the solutions of $φ$. A new merge operation ${\cal H}_φ\bigwedge {\cal H}_ψ$ is defined, where $ψ$ is a single 3-CNF clause. Given ${\cal H}_φ$ [but this can be of exponential complexity], the complexity needed for the computation of $Im \; {\cal H}_φ$, the set of all solutions, is shown to be polynomial for hard 3-CNF-SAT problems, i.e. the one with few ($\leq 2^k$) or no solutions. The third part uses the relation between ${\cal H}_φ$ and the indicator function $\mathbb{1}_{{\cal S}_φ}$ for the set of solutions, to develop a greedy polynomial algorithm to solve hard 3-CNF-SAT problems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.