Paper detail

Handling a large bound for a problem on the generalized Pillai equation $\pm r a^x \pm s b^y = c$

We consider $N$, the number of solutions $(x,y,u,v)$ to the equation $ (-1)^u r a^x + (-1)^v s b^y = c $ in nonnegative integers $x, y$ and integers $u, v \in \{0,1\}$, for given integers $a>1$, $b>1$, $c>0$, $r>0$ and $s>0$. Previous work showed that there are nine essentially distinct $(a,b,c,r,s)$ for which $N \ge 4$, except possibly for cases in which the solutions have $r$, $a$, $x$, $s$, $b$, and $y$ each bounded by $8 \cdot 10^{14}$ or $2 \cdot 10^{15}$. In this paper we show that there are no further cases with $N \ge 4$ within these bounds. We note that $N = 3$ for an infinite number of $(a,b,c,r,s)$, even if we eliminate from consideration cases which are directly derived from other cases in one of several completely designated ways. Our work differs from previous work in that we allow $x$ and $y$ to be zero and also allow choices of $(u,v)$ other than $(0,1)$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.