Paper detail

Hamiltonian Tetrahedralizations with Steiner Points

Let $S$ be a set of $n$ points in 3-dimensional space. A tetrahedralization $\mathcal{T}$ of $S$ is a set of interior disjoint tetrahedra with vertices on $S$, not containing points of $S$ in their interior, and such that their union is the convex hull of $S$. Given $\mathcal{T}$, $D_\mathcal{T}$ is defined as the graph having as vertex set the tetrahedra of $\mathcal{T}$, two of which are adjacent if they share a face. We say that $\mathcal{T}$ is Hamiltonian if $D_\mathcal{T}$ has a Hamiltonian path. Let $m$ be the number of convex hull vertices of $S$. We prove that by adding at most $\lfloor \frac{m-2}{2} \rfloor$ Steiner points to interior of the convex hull of $S$, we can obtain a point set that admits a Hamiltonian tetrahedralization. An $O(m^{3/2}) + O(n \log n)$ time algorithm to obtain these points is given. We also show that all point sets with at most 20 convex hull points admit a Hamiltonian tetrahedralization without the addition of any Steiner points. Finally we exhibit a set of 84 points that does not admit a Hamiltonian tetrahedralization in which all tetrahedra share a vertex.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.