Paper detail

Halpha Equivalent Widths from the 3D-HST survey: evolution with redshift and dependence on stellar mass

We investigate the evolution of the Halpha equivalent width, EW(Halpha), with redshift and its dependence on stellar mass, taking advantage of the first data from the 3D-HST survey, a large spectroscopic Treasury program with the Hubble Space Telescope WFC3. Combining our Halpha measurements of 854 galaxies at 0.8<z<1.5 with those of ground based surveys at lower and higher redshift, we can consistently determine the evolution of the EW(Halpha) distribution from z=0 to z=2.2. We find that at all masses the characteristic EW(Halpha) is decreasing towards the present epoch, and that at each redshift the EW(Halpha) is lower for high-mass galaxies. We measure a slope of EW(Halpha) ~ (1+z)^(1.8) with little mass dependence. Qualitatively, this measurement is a model-independent confirmation of the evolution of star forming galaxies with redshift. A quantitative conversion of EW(Halpha) to sSFR is very model dependent, because of differential reddening corrections between the continuum SED and the Balmer lines. The observed EW(Halpha) can be reproduced with a simple model in which the SFR for galaxies rises to the epoch of z~2.5 and then decreases with time to z = 0. The model implies that the EW(Halpha) rises to 400 A at z=8. The sSFR evolves faster than EW(Halpha), as the mass-to-light ratio also evolves with redshift. In this context, we find that the sSFR evolves as (1+z)^(3.2), nearly independent of mass, consistent with previous reddening insensitive estimates. We confirm previous results that the observed slope of the sSFR-z relation is steeper than the one predicted by models, but models and observations agree in finding little mass dependence.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.