Paper detail

Halo Stochasticity from Exclusion and non-linear Clustering

The clustering of galaxies in ongoing and upcoming galaxy surveys contains a wealth of cosmological information, but extracting this information is a non-trivial task since galaxies and their host haloes are stochastic tracers of the matter density field. This stochasticity is usually modeled as Poisson shot noise, which is constant as a function of wavenumber with amplitude given by 1/n, where n is the number density of galaxies. Here we use dark matter haloes in N-body simulations to show evidence for deviations from this simple behaviour and develop models that explain the behaviour of the large scale stochasticity. First, haloes are extended, non-overlapping objects, i.e., their correlation function needs to go to -1 on small scales. This leads to a negative correction to the stochasticity relative to the Poisson value at low wavenumber k, decreasing to zero for wavenumbers large compared to the inverse exclusion scale. Second, haloes show a non-linear enhancement of clustering outside the exclusion scale, leading to a positive stochasticity correction. Both of these effects go to zero for high-k, making the stochasticity scale dependent even for k<0.1 h/Mpc. We show that the corrections in the low-k regime are the same in Eulerian and Lagrangian space, but that the transition scale is pushed to smaller scales for haloes observed at present time, relative to the initial conditions. These corrections vary with halo mass and redshift. We also discuss simple applications of these effects to the galaxy samples with non-vanishing satellite fraction, where the stochasticity can again deviate strongly from the fiducial Poisson expectation. Overall these effects affect the clustering of galaxies at a level of a few percent even on very large scales and need to be modelled properly if we want to extract high precision cosmological information from the upcoming galaxy surveys.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.