Paper detail

Hall coefficient in amorphous alloys: critical behavior and quantitative test of quantum corrections due to weak localization and electron-electron interactions

Here, we present the measurements of $R_H$ in a series of $Ti_xSi_{100-x}$ amorphous reaching the critical concentration, $x_c\approx9-9.5$. For $x\geq17$, the Hall coefficient displays the behavior predicted by the perturbation theory, $R_H^{-1}\left(T\right)=R_H^{-1}\left(0\right)+bT^{1/2}$, which extends up to the temperature 150 K. The temperature dependence gets stronger in alloys with lower $x$; $R_H\left(0\right)$ diverges at $x_c$ displaying critical behavior. We used the combined conductivity and Hall coefficient data for alloys with high Ti content to test the theories of quantum corrections to conductivity. We found that the correction due to weak localization is dominated by the electron-phonon scattering with the rate varying with temperature as $τ_{ep}^{-1}=A_{ep}T^2$. The extracted parameter $A_{ep}$ is in good agreement with the theory that considers the incomplete drag of impurities by lattice vibrations. The spin-orbit scattering time extracted from the weak localization correction was found to be two orders of magnitude larger than the time given by the standard estimate $τ_{so}\approxτ\left(\hbar c/e^2Z\right)^4$. The theory of the EEI quantum correction was tested using the Hall coefficient and specific heat data for Ti-Si and $\left(Ag_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}\right)_{100-x}Ge_x$ amorphous alloys, which allowed us to estimate all microscopic parameters needed by the theory. We found that, within the accuracy of our measurements, the EEI theory works exactly for alloys that follow the free electron model [$\left(Ag_{0.5}Cu_{0.5}\right)_{100-x}Ge_x$ with $x\le50$.] The deviation from the theory observed in all Ti-Si alloys and in Ag-Cu-Ge alloys with $x\geq60$ can be qualitatively explained by weakening of the electron screening in the systems.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.