Paper detail

HALCONE : A Hardware-Level Timestamp-based Cache Coherence Scheme for Multi-GPU systems

While multi-GPU (MGPU) systems are extremely popular for compute-intensive workloads, several inefficiencies in the memory hierarchy and data movement result in a waste of GPU resources and difficulties in programming MGPU systems. First, due to the lack of hardware-level coherence, the MGPU programming model requires the programmer to replicate and repeatedly transfer data between the GPUs' memory. This leads to inefficient use of precious GPU memory. Second, to maintain coherency across an MGPU system, transferring data using low-bandwidth and high-latency off-chip links leads to degradation in system performance. Third, since the programmer needs to manually maintain data coherence, the programming of an MGPU system to maximize its throughput is extremely challenging. To address the above issues, we propose a novel lightweight timestamp-based coherence protocol, HALCONE, for MGPU systems and modify the memory hierarchy of the GPUs to support physically shared memory. HALCONE replaces the Compute Unit (CU) level logical time counters with cache level logical time counters to reduce coherence traffic. Furthermore, HALCONE introduces a novel timestamp storage unit (TSU) with no additional performance overhead in the main memory to perform coherence actions. Our proposed HALCONE protocol maintains the data coherence in the memory hierarchy of the MGPU with minimal performance overhead (less than 1\%). Using a set of standard MGPU benchmarks, we observe that a 4-GPU MGPU system with shared memory and HALCONE performs, on average, 4.6$\times$ and 3$\times$ better than a 4-GPU MGPU system with existing RDMA and with the recently proposed HMG coherence protocol, respectively. We demonstrate the scalability of HALCONE using different GPU counts (2, 4, 8, and 16) and different CU counts (32, 48, and 64 CUs per GPU) for 11 standard benchmarks.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.