Paper detail

Haggkvist-Hell Graphs: A class of Kneser-colorable graphs

For positive integers n and r we define the Haggkvist-Hell graph, H_{n:r}, to be the graph whose vertices are the ordered pairs (h,T) where T is an r-subset of [n], and h is an element of [n] not in T. Vertices (h_x,T_x) and (h_y,T_y) are adjacent iff h_x \in T_y, h_y \in T_x, and T_x and T_y are disjoint. These triangle-free arc transitive graphs are an extension of the idea of Kneser graphs, and there is a natural homomorphism from the Haggkvist-Hell graph, H_{n:r}, to the corresponding Kneser graph, K_{n:r}. Haggkvist and Hell introduced the r=3 case of these graphs, showing that a cubic graph admits a homomorphism to H_{22:3} if and only if it is triangle-free. Gallucio, Hell, and Nesetril also considered the r=3 case, proving that H_{n:3} can have arbitrarily large chromatic number. In this paper we give the exact values for diameter, girth, and odd girth of all Haggkvist-Hell graphs, and we give bounds for independence, chromatic, and fractional chromatic number. Furthermore, we extend the result of Gallucio et al. to any fixed r \ge 2, and we determine the full automorphism group of H_{n:r}, which is isomorphic to the symmetric group on n elements.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.