Paper detail

Hadronic B-Decays

Non-leptonic two-body decays are discussed on the basis of a generalized factorization approach. It is shown that a satisfactory description of numerous decay processes can be given using the same two parameters a_1^{eff} and a_2^{eff}. Although in general process-dependent, these parameters are not expected to change markedly. In fact, within error limits, there is no evidence for a process dependence in energetic B-decays. The success of factorization allows the determination of decay constants from non-leptonic decays. For the D_s meson one obtains f_{D_s}=(234\pm25) MeV, for the D^*_s meson f_{D_s^*}=(271\pm33) MeV. The ratio a_2^{eff}/a_1^{eff} is positive in B-decays and negative in D-decays corresponding to constructive and destructive interference in B^- and D^+ decays, respectively. Qualitatively, this can be understood considering the different scales or α_s-values governing the interaction among the outgoing quarks. The running of α_s is also the cause of the observed strong increase of the amplitude of lowest isospin when going to low energy transitions.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.