Paper detail

H2 formation and excitation in the Stephan's Quintet galaxy-wide collision

Context. The Spitzer Space Telescope has detected a powerful (L(H2)~10^41 erg s-1) mid-infrared H2 emission towards the galaxy-wide collision in the Stephan's Quintet (SQ) galaxy group. This discovery was followed by the detection of more distant H2-luminous extragalactic sources, with almost no spectroscopic signatures of star formation. These observations set molecular gas in a new context where one has to describe its role as a cooling agent of energetic phases of galaxy evolution. Aims. The SQ postshock medium is observed to be multiphase, with H2 gas coexisting with a hot (~ 5 10^6 K), X-ray emitting plasma. The surface brightness of H2 lines exceeds that of the X-rays and the 0-0 S(1) H2 linewidth is ~ 900 km s-1, of the same order of the collision velocity. These observations raise three questions we propose to answer: (i) Why H2 is present in the postshock gas ? (ii) How can we account for the H2 excitation ? (iii) Why H2 is a dominant coolant ? Methods. We consider the collision of two flows of multiphase dusty gas. Our model quantifies the gas cooling, dust destruction, H2 formation and excitation in the postshock medium. Results. (i) The shock velocity, the post-shock temperature and the gas cooling timescale depend on the preshock gas density. The collision velocity is the shock velocity in the low density volume filling intercloud gas. This produces a ~ 5 10^6 K, dust-free, X-ray emitting plasma. The shock velocity is smaller in clouds. We show that gas heated to temperatures less than 10^6 K cools, keeps its dust content and becomes H2 within the SQ collision age (~ 5 10^6 years). (ii) Since the bulk kinetic energy of the H2 gas is the dominant energy reservoir, we consider that the H2 emission is powered by the dissipation of kinetic turbulent energy. (Abridged)

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.