Paper detail

H-alpha Images of Ultra-Flat Edge-On Spiral Galaxies

We present the H$α$ images of ultra-flat (UF) spiral galaxies seen practically edge-on. The galaxies have the angular diameter in the $B$ band $a> 1.9^{\prime}$ and the apparent axial ratio $(a/b) >10$. We found that their H$α$ images look, on average, almost two times thinner than those in the red continuum. The star-formation rate in the studied objects, determined from the H$α$ flux, is in good agreement with that calculated from the $FUV$ flux from the GALEX survey if we use the modified Verheijen and Sancisi formula taking into account the internal extinction in the UF galaxies. The logarithm of the specific star-formation rate in the UF galaxies shows a small scatter, $0.19$, with a smooth decrease from $-10.4$ for dwarf spirals to $-10.7$ for massive ones. The relative amount of the hydrogen mass in UF disks varies from about 50\% in dwarf disks to about 8\% in massive ones. Structural distortions are less common in the UF galaxies (about 16\%) than those in thick (less isolated) disks of edge-on spiral galaxies. On the cosmic time scale, 13.7 Gyr, large spiral disks are more efficient "engines" for gas processing into stars than dwarf spirals.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.