Paper detail

H-alpha emission in local galaxies: star formation, time variability and the diffuse ionized gas

The nebular recombination line H$α$ is widely used as a star-formation rate (SFR) indicator in the local and high-redshift Universe. We present a detailed H$α$ radiative transfer study of high-resolution isolated Milky-Way and Large Magellanic Cloud simulations that include radiative transfer, non-equilibrium thermochemistry, and dust evolution. We focus on the spatial morphology and temporal variability of the H$α$ emission, and its connection to the underlying gas and star formation properties. The H$α$ and H$β$ radial and vertical surface brightness profiles are in excellent agreement with observations of nearby galaxies. We find that the fraction of H$α$ emission from collisional excitation amounts to $f_{\rm col}\sim5-10\%$, only weakly dependent on radius and vertical height, and that scattering boosts the H$α$ luminosity by $\sim40\%$. The dust correction via the Balmer decrement works well (intrinsic H$α$ emission recoverable within $25\%$), though the dust attenuation law depends on the amount of attenuation itself both on spatially resolved and integrated scales. Important for the understanding of the H$α$-SFR connection is the dust and helium absorption of ionizing radiation (Lyman continuum [LyC] photons), which are about $f_{\rm abs}\approx28\%$ and $f_{\rm He}\approx9\%$, respectively. Together with an escape fraction of $f_{\rm esc}\approx6\%$, this reduces the available budget for hydrogen line emission by nearly half ($f_{\rm H}\approx57\%$). We discuss the impact of the diffuse ionized gas, showing - among other things - that the extraplanar H$α$ emission is powered by LyC photons escaping the disc. Future applications of this framework to cosmological (zoom-in) simulations will assist in the interpretation of spectroscopy of high-redshift galaxies with the upcoming James Webb Space Telescope.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.