Abstract

Previous numerical studies have shown that in protostellar outflows, the mass-velocity distribution m(v)m(v) can be well described by a broken power law ∝v−γ\propto v^{- γ}. On the other hand, recent observations of a sample of outflows show that the CO intensity-velocity distribution, closely related to m(v)m(v), follows an exponential law ∝exp⁡(−v/v0)\propto \exp(-v/v_0). In the present work, we revisit the physical origin of the mass-velocity relationship m(v)m(v) in jet-driven protostellar outflows. We investigate the respective contributions of the different regions of the outflow, from the swept-up ambient gas to the jet. We performed 3D numerical simulations of a protostellar jet propagating into a molecular cloud using the hydrodynamical code Yguazu-a. The code takes into account atomic and ionic species and was modified to include the H2_2 gas. We find that by excluding the jet contribution, m(v)m(v) is satisfyingly fitted with a single exponential law, with v0v_0 well in the range of observational values. The jet contribution results in additional components in the mass-velocity relationship. This empirical mass-velocity relationship is found to be valid locally in the outflow. The exponent v0v_0 is almost constant in time and for a given level of mixing between the ambient medium and the jet material. In general, v0v_0 displays only a weak spatial dependence. A simple modeling of the L1157 outflow successfully reproduces the various components of the observed CO intensity-velocity relationship. Our simulations indicate that these components trace the outflow cavity of swept-up gas and the material entrained along the jet, respectively. The CO intensity-velocity exponential law is naturally explained by the jet-driven outflow model. The entrained material plays an important role in shaping the mass-velocity profile.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.