Paper detail

$H_0$ as a Universal FLRW Diagnostic

We reverse the logic behind the apparent existence of $H_0$-tension, to design diagnostics for cosmological models. The basic idea is that the non-constancy of $H_0$ inferred from observations at different redshifts is a null hypothesis test for models within the FLRW paradigm -- if $H_0$ runs, the model is wrong. Depending on the kind of observational data, the most suitable form of the diagnostic can vary. As examples, we present two $H_0$ diagnostics that are adapted to two different BAO observables. We use these and the corresponding BAO data to Gaussian reconstruct the running of $H_0$ in flat $Λ$CDM with Planck values for the model parameters. For flat $Λ$CDM when the radiation contribution can be neglected, with comoving distance data, the diagnostic is a simple hypergeometric function. Possible late time deviations from the FLRW paradigm can also be accommodated, by simply keeping track of the (potentially anisotropic) sky variation of the diagnostic.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.