Paper detail

GSH 90-28-17: a Possible Old Supernova Remnant

GSH 90-28-17 is a high-latitude galactic HI supershell, identified in the HI supershell catalogs with a velocity of $v_{lsr}\sim-17$ \kms. We used the new Arecibo GALFA-HI survey data which have much higher resolution and sensitivity than what were previously available to re-examine the properties of the supershell. We derived a new distance of 400 pc for GSH 90-28-17 and suggested that it is related to the Lac OB1 association. The radius of GSH 90-28-17 is 66.0$\pm$3.5 pc. The HI mass of the shell is (3.1$\pm0.1)\times10^{4}$ M$_{\odot}$. It has an age of $\sim4.5$ Myr and a total kinetic energy of (8.2$\pm0.3)\times10^{48}$ ergs. We extracted radio continuum data for the GSH 90-28-17 region from the 408 MHz all-sky Survey and Bonn 1420 MHz survey, and filtered the diffuse background Galactic emission. A radio loop-like ridge is found to be associated with the HI shell at both frequencies, and shows a nonthermal origin with a TT-plot index of $α$=-1.35$\pm$0.69. In addition, the pulsar J2307+2225 with a similar distance is found in the shell region. We conclude that GSH 90-28-17 is probably an old, type II supernova remnant in the solar neighborhood.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.