Paper detail

Growth signals determine the topology of evolving networks

Network science provides an indispensable theoretical framework for studying the structure and function of real complex systems. Different network models are often used for finding the rules that govern their evolution, whereby the correct choice of model details is crucial for obtaining relevant insights. We here study how the structure of networks generated with the aging nodes model depends on the properties of the growth signal. We use different fluctuating signals and compare structural dissimilarities of the networks with those obtained with a constant growth signal. We show that networks with power-law degree distributions, which are obtained with time-varying growth signals, are correlated and clustered, while networks obtained with a constant growth signal are not. Indeed, the properties of the growth signal significantly determine the topology of the obtained networks and thus ought to be considered prominently in models of complex systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.