Paper detail

Growth Patterns of US Children from 1963 to 2012

Anthropometric measurements such as weight, stature (height), and body mass index (BMI) provide reliable indicators of children's growth. The 2000 CDC growth charts are the national standards in the United States for these important measures. But these growth charts were generated using data from 1963-1994. To understand the growth patterns of US children since 1994, we generate weight-for-age, stature-for-age and BMI-for-age percentile curves for both boys and girls aged 2-20 through the methods used to generate the 2000 CDC growth charts. Our datasets are from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for years 1999-2010 and and from NorthShore University HealthSystem's Enterprise Data Warehouse (NS-EDW) for years 2006-2012. The weight and BMI percentile curves generated from NS-EDW and NHANES data differ substantially from the CDC percentile curves, while those for stature do not differ substantially. We conclude that the population weight and BMI values of US children in recent years have increased significantly since 2000 and the 2000 CDC growth charts may no longer be applicable to the current population of US children. Our charts poignantly reveals the increasing obesity of American children.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.