Paper detail

Growth of massive black holes during radiatively inefficient accretion phases

The massive black holes in most faint active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and even normal galaxies are still accreting gases, though their accretion rates are very low. Radiatively inefficient accretion flows (RIAFs) are supposed in these faint sources, which should radiate mostly in the hard X-ray band. We calculate the contribution to the X-ray background from both the bright AGNs and the RIAFs in faint AGNs/normal galaxies. Our calculations show that both the observed intensity and spectral shape of the XRB with an energy peak at ~30$ keV can be well reproduced without including the emission of Compton-thick AGNs, if the massive black holes in faint AGNs/normal galaxies are spinning rapidly with a~0.9 and accreting at rates ~1.0-3.0\times 10^{-4}. It indicates that less than ~5 per cent of local massive black hole mass density was accreted during radiatively inefficient accretion phases, which is obviously only an upper limit, because Compton-thick AGNs have not been considered. If the same number of the Compton-thick AGNs with log N_H=24-25 as those with log N_H=23-24 is considered, the fraction of local black hole mass density accumulated during inefficient accretion phases should be lower than ~2 per cent.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.