Paper detail

Growth Law of Bunch Size in Step Bunching Induced by Flow in Solution

By carrying out Monte Carlo simulations,we study step bunching during solution growth. For simplicity, we consider a square lattice, which represents a diffusion field in a solution, and express the diffusion of atoms as the hopping of atoms on the lattice sites. In our model, we neglect the fluctuation along steps. An array of steps is expressed as dots on a one-dimensional vicinal face. Step bunching occurs in the case of step-down flow. In previous study (M. Sato: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. {\bf 79} (2010) 064606), we studied step bunching with a slow flow and showed that the width of the fluctuation of step distance increases as $t^α$ with $α=1/3$ in the initial stage. In this paper, we carry out simulations with a faster flow. With a faster flow, the width of the fluctuation of step distance first increases as $t^α$ with $α=1/2$,which is larger than the exponent with a slow flow, and then an interval during which the width increases as $t^{1/3}$ appears.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.