Paper detail

Growth Index after the Planck Results

The growth index $γ_L$ was proposed to investigate the possible deviation from the standard $Λ$CDM model and Einstein's gravity theory in a dynamical perspective. Recently, thanks to the measurement of the cosmic growth rate via the redshift-space distortion, one can understand the evolution of density contrast through $fσ_8(z)$, where $f(z)=d\ln δ/d \ln a$ is the growth rate of matter and $σ_8(z)$ is the rms amplitude of the density contrast $δ$ at the comoving $8h^{-1}$ Mpc scale. In this paper, we use the redshift space distortion data points to study the growth index on the bases of Einstein's gravity theory and a modified gravity theory under the assumption of $f=Ω_m(a)^{γ_L}$. The cosmic background evolution is fixed by the cosmic observations from the type Ia supernovae SNLS3, cosmic microwave background radiation data from {\it Planck} and baryon acoustic oscillations. Via the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method, we found the $γ_L$ values for Einstein's gravity with a cosmological constant, $w=constant$ dark energy and a modified gravity theory in the $1,2,3σ$ regions respectively: $0.675_{-0.0662-0.120-0.155}^{+0.0611+0.129+0.178}$, $0.745_{-0.0819-0.146-0.190}^{+0.0755+0.157+0.205}$ and $0.555_{-0.0167-0.0373-0.0516}^{+0.0193+0.0335+0.0436}$. In the Einstein's gravity theory, the values of growth index $γ_L$ show almost $2σ$ deviation from the theoretical prediction 6/11 for the $Λ$CDM model. However in the modified gravity framework, a deviation from the Einstein's relativity is not detected in $1σ$ region. That implies that the currently available cosmic observations don't expect an alternative modified gravity theory beyond the $Λ$CDM model under Einstein's gravity, but that the simple assumption of $f=Ω_m^{γ_L}$ should be improved.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.