Paper detail

Growth, Annealing Effects on Superconducting and Magnetic Properties and Anisotropy of FeSe_1-x_Te_x_ (0.5 =< x =< 1) Single Crystals

Single crystals of FeSe_1-x_Te_x_ (0.5=<x=<1) have been grown by the Bridgman method. After annealing them at 400 deg for 100 h in vacuum, single crystals of x=0.5-0.9 have exhibited bulk superconductivity. Anisotropic properties of the electrical resistivity and upper critical field, H_c2_, have been investigated for the single-crystal FeSe_1-x_Te_x_ with x=0.6. It has been found that the in-plane resistivity, Rho_ab_, shows a metallic temperature-dependence, while the out-of-plane resistivity, Rho_c_, shows a broad maximum around 100 K. The resistivity ratio, Rho_ab_/Rho_c_, is 44 and 70 at 290 K and just above the superconducting transition temperature, T_c_, respectively. The anisotropic parameter, gamma= H_c2_^para^/H_c2_^perp^ (The para and perp indicate field directions parallel and perpendicular to the ab-plane, respectively.), is estimated as 2.7 just below T_c_.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.