Paper detail

Growing random graphs with a preferential attachment structure

The aim of this paper is to develop a method for proving almost sure convergence in Gromov-Hausodorff-Prokhorov topology for a class of models of growing random graphs that generalises Rémy's algorithm for binary trees. We describe the obtained limits using some iterative gluing construction that generalises the famous line-breaking construction of Aldous' Brownian tree. In order to do that, we develop a framework in which a metric space is constructed by gluing smaller metric spaces, called \emph{blocks}, along the structure of a (possibly infinite) discrete tree. Our growing random graphs seen as metric spaces can be understood in this framework, that is, as evolving blocks glued along a growing discrete tree structure. Their scaling limit convergence can then be obtained by separately proving the almost sure convergence of every block and verifying some relative compactness property for the whole structure. For the particular models that we study, the discrete tree structure behind the construction has the distribution of an affine preferential attachment tree or a weighted recursive tree. We strongly rely on results concerning those two models of random trees and their connection, obtained in a companion paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.