Paper detail

Group theory and the link between expectation values of powers of $r$ and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients

In a recent paper [J.-C. Pain, Opt. Spectrosc. ${\bf 218}$, 1105-1109 (2020)], we discussed the link between expectation values of powers of $r$ and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. In this short note we provide additional information, reminding that such a connection is a direct consequence of group theory. The hydrogenic radial wavefunctions form bases for infinite dimensional representations of the algebra of the non-compact group $O(2,1)$ and the expectation values $r^p$ and $r^{-p}$ ($p$ being positive) transform as tensors with respect to this algebra. As shown a long time ago by Armstrong [L. Armstrong Jr., J . Phys. (Paris) Suppl. C 4 ${\bf 31}$, 17 (1970)], analysis of matrix elements of $r^p$ and $r^{-p}$ reveals that the Wigner-Eckart theorem is valid for this group and that the corresponding Clebsch-Gordan coefficients are proportional to the usual $SO(3)$ Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. This proportionality provides simple explanations of the selection rules for hydrogenic radial matrix elements pointed out by Pasternack and Sternheimer, and the proportionality of hydrogenic expectation values of $r^p$ and $r^{-p}$ to $3jm$ symbols.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.