Paper detail

Group Theoretical Analysis of Quasicrystallography from Projections of Higher Dimensional Lattices Bn

A group theoretical discussion on the hypercubic lattice described by the affine Coxeter-Weyl group Wa(Bn) has been presented. When the lattice is projected onto the Coxeter plane it is noted that the maximal dihedral subgroup Dh of W(Bn) with h = 2n representing the Coxeter number describes the h-fold symmetric quasicrystallography. Higher dimensional cubic lattices are explicitly constructed for n = 4, 5, 6. Their rank 3 Coxeter subgroups and maximal dihedral subgroups are identified. It has been explicitly shown that when their Voronoi cells are decomposed under the respective rank 3 subgroups W(A3),W(H2) x W(A1) and W(H3) one obtains the rhombic dodecahedron, rhombic icosahedron and rhombic triacontahedron respectively. Projection of the lattice B4 onto the Coxeter plane represents quasicrystal structures with 8-fold symmetry. The B5 lattice is used to describe the quasicrystals with both 5-fold and 10-fold symmetries. The lattice B6 can describe a 12-fold symmetric quasicrystal as well as a 3D icosahedral quasicrystal depending on the choice of subspace of projections. The novel structures from the projected sets of lattice points are compatible with the available experimental data.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.