Paper detail

Group-Theoretic Wideband Radar Waveform Design

We investigate the theory of affine groups in the context of designing radar waveforms that obey the desired wideband ambiguity function (WAF). The WAF is obtained by correlating the signal with its time-dilated, Doppler-shifted, and delayed replicas. We consider the WAF definition as a coefficient function of the unitary representation of the group $a\cdot x + b$. This is essentially an algebraic problem applied to the radar waveform design. Prior works on this subject largely analyzed narrow-band ambiguity functions. Here, we show that when the underlying wideband signal of interest is a pulse or pulse train, a tight frame can be built to design that waveform. Specifically, we design the radar signals by minimizing the ratio of bounding constants of the frame in order to obtain lower sidelobes in the WAF. This minimization is performed by building a codebook based on difference sets in order to achieve the Welch bound. We show that the tight frame so obtained is connected with the wavelet transform that defines the WAF.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.