Paper detail

Grounding Occam's Razor in a Formal Theory of Simplicity

A formal theory of simplicity is introduced, in the context of a "combinational" computation model that views computation as comprising the iterated transformational and compositional activity of a population of agents upon each other. Conventional measures of simplicity in terms of algorithmic information etc. are shown to be special cases of a broader understanding of the core "symmetry" properties constituting what is defined here as a Compositional Simplicity Measure (CoSM). This theory of CoSMs is extended to a theory of CoSMOS (Combinational Simplicity Measure Operating Sets) which involve multiple simplicity measures utilized together. Given a vector of simplicity measures, an entity is associated not with an individual simplicity value but with a "simplicity bundles" of Pareto-optimal simplicity-value vectors. CoSMs and CoSMOS are then used as a foundation for a theory of pattern and multipattern, and a theory of hierarchy and heterarchy in systems of patterns. A formalization of the cognitive-systems notion of a "coherent dual network" interweaving hierarchy and heterarchy in a consistent way is presented. The high level end result of this investigation is to re-envision Occam's Razor as something like: When in doubt, prefer hypotheses whose simplicity bundles are Pareto optimal, partly because doing so both permits and benefits from the construction of coherent dual networks comprising coordinated and consistent multipattern hierarchies and heterarchies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.